Welcome to BillBreakdown.com—where we simplify complex legal documents into understandable segments. If you're seeking clear, straightforward explanations of intricate legislation, you've come to the right place. Our thorough, detailed approach helps you navigate legal jargon and understand the implications of various bills. This page covers the NSW Equality Bill 2023. Click "Learn more" for explainer, impact and recommendations.
See Rebuttals of misinformation from Equality Australia, MP Greenwich, Gender Centre et al. UPDATE: The Equality Bill was passed 17/10/24. This site is in the process of being updated.
SCHEDULE (delayed)
Amendment of Anti-Discrimination Act 1977.
Proposes removing sex-based protections in sports, allowing self-identified gender identity to dictate participation, compromising fairness and safety in female sports.
-
Increase of physical harm to females.
-
Females self-excluding sport due to male inclusion.
-
Australia out of sync with World competition standards that allow female only.
Recommendations:
-
Reinstate and maintain sex-based definitions and protections in sports to ensure fairness and safety.
-
Enforce stringent guidelines that prioritise biological sex in sports categories to protect the integrity of women's sports.
-
Withdraw the proposed amendments.
SCHEDULE 1
Births, Deaths, and Marriages Registration Act 1995 amendment.
Simplified self-declaration of legal sex undermines the authenticity of public records and erodes sex-based protections, entrenching discrimination against females and LGB in NSW law.
-
Completely undermines the reliability of government data.
-
Cost & security implications of frequent identity changes.
Recommendations:
-
Retain sex markers on birth certificates and other official documents to ensure accuracy in identification and statistical data.
-
Prohibit changes to legal sex based on self-declaration.
-
Maintain record integrity.
-
Withdraw the proposed amendments.
SCHEDULE 2
Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 amendment.
The Schedule 3 amendments radically propose lowering the current standards for obtaining medical consent for minors, reducing parental involvement and oversight, and recklessly suggesting that children can consent to medical treatment with lifelong, irreversible effects.
The Cass Review
A recent UK systematic review of the evidence regarding Gender Affirming Care was released. The Cass Review:
-
Questions the claim that suicide risks are significantly alleviated by medical affirmation.
-
Debunks the falsehood that puberty blockers are safe and reversible.
-
Finds insufficient evidence supporting the overall benefits of gender-affirming treatments.
-
Criticised the overemphasis on assessing Gillick competence in isolation, without adequately considering the quality and comprehensiveness of information given to patients and their families for informed consent.
SCHEDULE (Delayed)
Children’s Guardian Act 2019 amendment.
FThe amendments could change the primary focus of child welfare decisions from a child's best health interests to aligning with specific ideological views on gender identity and sexual characteristics. This means decisions could favour supporting gender transitioning more readily, which in most cases will not align with the child's overall welfare needs..
Recommendations:
-
Uphold rigorous consent processes for minors undergoing medical treatments related to ‘gender identity’, ensuring parental involvement and psychological assessment.
-
Strengthen safeguards to prevent undue influence by external bodies or ideologies on minors making life-altering decisions.
-
Withdraw the proposed amendments
SCHEDULE (delayed)
Court Security Act 2005 Amendment
The proposed amendments compromise court security protocols by allowing individuals to choose search officers based on self-identified gender identity, affecting the privacy and safety of both security personnel and the public.
-
Creating a special class of based on feelings.
-
Ignoring privacy & safety concerns.
Recommendation:
-
Implement protocols that prioritise biological sex of individuals during security screenings to preserve the privacy and safety of all involved.
-
Require that searches be conducted by officers of the same biological sex.
SCHEDULE (Delayed)
Crimes Act 1900 Amendment.
Including sex work, an occupational choice), as a protected category against incitement to violence dilutes the focus on inherent personal characteristics, impacting the effectiveness of legal protections against discrimination.
Recommendation:
-
Withdraw the proposed amendments
SCHEDULE (delayed)
Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999
The amendments propose to redefine search protocols in correctional facilities based on an unverifiable gender identity, compromising the safety of women and their right to refuse consent, and the privacy of female officers and inmates.
Recommendation:
-
Ensure that search procedures in correctional facilities are based on biological sex, to protect the safety and privacy of inmates and staff.
SCHEDULE 3
Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007
Broadening definitions to include coercive behaviour related to gender identity could be misused, affecting the legal recourse for domestic violence cases and impacting the safety of victims.
-
Weaponising the family court
Recommendation:
-
Withdraw the proposed amendments
-
Remove all references to “gender history”, “out a person”, “variation of sex characteristics”, and “sex work”.
SCHEDULE (delayed)
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 Amendment
The amendments could complicate forensic procedures by allowing suspects to choose examiners based on gender identity, potentially impacting the integrity of forensic examinations.
-
Safety & Privacy Risk
-
Inversion of Power
Recommendation:
-
Forensic procedures should be conducted by personnel based on the biological sex of the person being examined to maintain the dignity and privacy of all parties.
-
Implement strict guidelines to avoid manipulation of forensic procedures through self-declared gender identity preferences.
SCHEDULE 4
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Including gender identity as an aggravating factor in sentencing prioritises certain groups over others, impacting judicial fairness and eroding established legal principles.
Recommendation:
-
Avoid incorporating gender identity as an aggravating factor in sentencing to maintain judicial impartiality and fairness.
-
Focus on protecting all individuals equally under the law without giving undue weight to unverifiable personal identities.
SCHEDULE (Delayed)
Amendment of Government Sectior Employment Act 2013 No 40
Mandating quotas based on gender identity introduces reverse discrimination, complicating merit-based employment and diversity balance within public sector employment.
Recommendation:
-
Maintain merit-based employment practices without imposing quotas for unverifiable identities, to ensure fairness and equality in government sector employment.
-
Withdraw the proposed amendments
SCHEDULE (Delayed)
Government Sector Employment (General) Rules 2014
Specific employment categories for ‘intersex’ and ‘transgender’ persons undermines meritocracy and causes administrative challenges and hardship in establishing eligibility.
Recommendation:
-
Avoid specific categories based on gender identity in employment eligibility to prevent reverse discrimination and uphold meritocracy.
-
Foster an inclusive workplace environment that respects a diverse range of views and identities without mandating ideological conformity.
SCHEDULE (delayed)
Amendment of Interpretation Act 1987
Alterations to definitions easily lead to legal ambiguities, particularly concerning the distinction between sex and gender identity, complicating the enforcement of laws designed to protect sex-specific rights.
Recommendation:
-
Maintain clarity in legal language by upholding distinctions between sex and gender and gender identity, ensuring that laws prioritise and protect sex-based rights over unverifiable identity claims.
-
Revise proposed definitions to ensure they do not erase or confuse legal recognition of sex-specific protections and rights.
SCHEDULE (delayed)
Amendment of Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002
Changes to search protocols based on self-identified gender could endanger the safety and dignity of law enforcement personnel and individuals being searched.
Recommendation:
-
Law enforcement procedures, particularly searches, should respect, recognise and prioritise the biological sex of individuals to safeguard privacy and security.
SCHEDULE 6
Amendment of Mental Health Act 2007
The proposed amendment states that "expressing or not expressing a particular gender identity or gender expression" cannot be considered indicative of mental illness or disorder.
* If the distress around Gender Identity is not a health issue, why is gender identity affirmation funded as a health issue?
* Legislation should not direct clinical diagnosis.
Recommendation:
-
Ensure that mental health assessments can consider all aspects of an individual's identity and behaviour without legislative restrictions related to gender identity.
-
Comprehensive care and accurate diagnoses should not be obscured by gender identity claims.
SCHEDULE (delayed)
Amendment of Sheriff Act 2005
Amendments may compromise operational integrity in law enforcement, particularly in contexts requiring clear legal identification based on biological sex.
Overall Concern:
-
Power inversion of the criminal justice system. The Equality Bill seeks to create a “special class” of suspect/prisoner who will not be subject to the same conditions as every other prisoner.
Recommendation:
-
Implement procedures that prioritise biological sex in operational protocols to ensure the safety and privacy of individuals under sheriff's jurisdiction.
-
Provide clear legal definitions that support the prioritisation of biological sex in operational protocols to ensure the safety and privacy of individuals under sheriff’s jurisdiction.
SCHEDULE 7
Amendment of Summary Offences Act 1988 No 25
Concerns with Decriminalisation of Prostitution
Increased Exploitation and Trafficking: The removal of the prostitution provisions in the Summary Offences Act which aim to protect prostituted persons, will lead to increased exploitation and trafficking of women and girls and allow for solicitation and sex acts in public places, including in front of schools, hospitals, parks, etc.
Recommendation:
-
Retain sections that criminalise bad actors who exploit prostitution.
-
Retain sections that protect public and individual welfare against the risks associated with an unregulated prostitution industry.
-
Consider implementing the Nordic Model, which focuses on criminalising the buying of sex while simultaneously protecting prostituted persons rather than decriminalising aspects that could lead to increased exploitation.
Amendment of Surrogacy Act 2010 No 102
The changes to the Surrogacy Act 2010 facilitates the commercialisation and exploitation of women and children, undermines the integrity of parentage orders, and erode existing legal safeguards. The proposed amendments do not consider the best interests of women and children. It also supports modern slavery, child trafficking and the orgaan removal industry.
Recommendation:
-
Maintain Geographical Nexus for Offences: Ensure that Section 11 is retained to maintain clarity and effective legal recourse against cross-border surrogacy exploitation.
-
Uphold Non-commercialisation of Surrogacy: Retain the prohibition against commercial surrogacy to prevent the exploitation of vulnerable women and children.
-
Fight Commercial Surrogacy
What is Commercial Surrogacy?