Schedule 5: Court Security Act 2005
Definitions and References (Amendments to Section 4 and New Section 4A)
The Impact of Recognising Gender Identities
Problematic Definitions
The definitions of "intersex" and "transgender" are broad, subjective and unverifiable. Any man requiring to be searched under the Act may therefore claim to be “intersex” (a medical condition, not a “third” sex), a female or non-binary, or any other sex descriptor, and demand to be searched by a female officer.
​
Conflation of Gender Identity with Sex
There is a challenging balance between respecting gender identity preferences and ensuring that the security measures in place protect everyone. For example, if gender identity is considered equally important as biological sex, it unnecessarily complicates the way searches are conducted.
Operational Challenges
Accommodating unverifiable gender identities (s 10(2)(f) and (g)), introduces variables that could lead to less rigorous searches, thereby heightening the risk of security breaches. The primary purpose of these searches is to ensure that no prohibited or dangerous items are brought into secure areas, not to accommodate or validate a claimed identity.
Proposed Amendments Require Superfluous Training
Implementing these amendments would necessitate significant revisions to training programs and operational policies, requiring extensive training for security personnel to effectively navigate the complex dynamics of gender identity in search protocols, leading to additional and unnecessary costs and logistical challenges.
Misinterpretation of Discrimination
The changes proposed purport to address discrimination, however existing court protocols are not discriminatory. They are standard procedures to maintain security and order.
Inversion of Power Dynamics
The Schedule 5 amendments invert the usual power dynamics between the court and the suspect. It will give more power and authority to suspects, elevating security risks to address a non-issue.
Special Treatment for Suspects
All suspects are equal before the law. There should be no special privilege on the basis of gender identity. This unwarranted provision grants undue privileges to individuals facing scrutiny for criminal conduct.
Recommendation:
-
Implement protocols that prioritise biological sex of individuals during security screenings to preserve the privacy and safety of all involved.